RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 			DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03675

					COUNSEL:  NONE

					HEARING DESIRED:  NO 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed to either Greenville, SC or 
Gainesville, FL.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She entered active duty in Greenville, SC and was commissioned 
in Gainesville, FL.  Her HOR should reflect either of these 
addresses.

In support of her request, the applicant provides a personal 
statement and copies of her AF IMTs 766, Extended Active Duty 
Order; DD Form 1351-2, Travel Voucher or Subvoucher; and various 
other documents related to her request.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in 
the grade of major.

On 4 January 2005, the applicant was appointed to the Air Force 
Reserve via AF Form 24, Application for Appointment as Reserve 
of the Air Force or USAF without Component, and recorded her HOR 
address as Boynton Beach-Palm Beach, FL.


THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPANF recommends denial.  In January 2004, the applicant 
completed her AF Form 24 and recorded her HOR address as Palm 
Beach, FL.  In March 2004, she was commissioned as a second 
lieutenant in the Air Force Reserve in Gainesville, FL with the 
intent to attend the Health Professions Scholarship Program 
(HPSP) at the University of Florida.  In May 2005, her Extended 
Active Duty (EAD) order was published reflecting her HOR address 
as Boynton Beach-Palm Beach, FL, the same as shown on her AF 
Form 24.  In May 2006, upon completion of HPSP she was 
reappointed in the grade of captain in the Air Force Reserve.  
She remained in the Reserve while attending her civilian 
residency program in Greenville, SC.  In accordance with her EAD 
order and travel voucher, she reflected Greenville, SC as the 
address she departed from for active duty.

The Joint Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR), Volume I, Appendix 
A, reads “Home of Record (HOR) is the place recorded as the 
individual's home when commissioned, appointed, enlisted, 
inducted, or ordered into a tour of active duty.”  Additionally, 
the JFTR states “the place recorded as the individual's home 
when reinstated, reappointed, or reenlisted remains the same as 
that recorded when commissioned, appointed enlisted or inducted 
or ordered into the tour of active duty unless there is a break 
in service of more than one full day.  Any such correction must 
be fully justified and the home, as corrected, must be the 
member's actual home upon entering the Service, and not a 
different place selected for the member's convenience.”  The 
applicant did not have a break in service of more than one full 
day; therefore, a change to her HOR is not authorized.

The complete DPANF evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit 
B.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 10 February 2015, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was 
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 
30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this 
office (Exhibit C).


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the 
rationale expressed as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.


The following members of the Board considered this application 
in Executive Session on 9 June 2015, under the provisions of AFI 
36-2603:

      , Panel Chair
      , Member
      , Member

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-03675 was considered:

      	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 26 August 2014, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPANF, dated 12 November 2014,   
            w/atchs.
     	Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 February 2015.